I loved this book. The Panama Canal story is an extraordinary, epic tale and Matthew Parker's marvellous account more than does it justice.

The book is written with a sure feel for the grand sweep of history: the unprecedented engineering challenge, the daunting geography of the mountainous Panamanian jungles, the strategic imperatives, the complex and fascinating finances, and the heart-rending and totally unforeseen logistical difficulties that turned dreams to nightmares.

At the same time the author has a wonderful nose for characters and this book has a rich and compelling cast to propel the story along. Parker clearly is a fine historian and one of the most impressive aspects of this book is the original work he has clearly done in scouring the archives to deliver a wealth of original written accounts - letters, diaries, company memos, political machinations, and so on.

The structure of the story is fascinating. The canal was begun by the French, expected to be the crowning glory of the man who built the Suez Canal, Ferdinand de Lesseps: and the years of disaster didn't just finish him but came close to bankrupting a generation of French investors. The canal then went into a second, very different phase, after the rising power of the United States took it over as the keystone of a very modern strategic vision of the future. The Americans, it should be said, also completed it.

Parker devotes roughly half of the book to each phase, and the contrast is amazing - between, if you like, the Victorian era of Jules Verne fantasies and the modern age of skyscrapers and internal combustion engines. All this helps to make this story not just a historical epic but also a very modern tale of engineering on the grand scale.

All in all I heartily recommend this book. I read a lot of non-fiction and this has been one of the treats of the year. Buy it!

Parker's Panama Fever is a magazine article. The 500-page book is padded with mind-numbing detail. I can't think of a friend to whom I might pass on (inflict?) my partially-read copy. Van

This book is subtitled "The Epic Story of One of the Greatest Human Achievements of All Time - the Building of the Panama Canal." It should have been subtitled "The Tragic Story of American Racism, Imperialism, and Exploitation during the Building of the Panama Canal," because this is clearly the theme.

The heroes of this tale are the West Indian blacks, chiefly British subjects, who provided the bulk of the unskilled workforce. The villians are the Americans, who are depicted as ruthless opportunists and bullies. The French are cast as an idealistic people intending a great service to humanity who were misled and robbed by a few frauds and charlatans involved in their canal project.

The social history is an interesting and worthy topic, but suffers from being told out of context. There is a palpable pro-European, anti-American bias. The casual reader might well infer that the evils of racism and imperialism were uniquely American, because the British author gives few details that would allow a reasoned comparison of American attitudes and practice to those then prevailing in British India and South Africa.

But all histories are biased to some extent. The chief fault of "Panama Fever" is that the social history is told to the near-exclusion of the details of the engineering project that is the ostensible subject of the book. The technical aspects are glossed over, and the building of the canal appears merely as a picturesque but indistinct backdrop for the social and political themes.

Upon finishing this book, I feel much like the protagonist West Indian canal worker: thinking that I was to vicariously participate in a great engineering project, I have been brought to a strange land under false pretenses and cheated by one who clearly believes himself to be my social, moral, and intellectual superior. It is a bad feeling; my sympathy for the victims of racism and imperialism is increased. But I would still like to learn a bit about the canal.

Parker provides a fairly through history of the building of the Panama Canal, including both the French efforts and the final American success. There is a lot of social history (life of the laborers, that sort of thing) and some but not a lot about the engineering involved.

David McCullough's THE PATH BETWEEN THE SEAS is still the best account of the Canal and its construction, but you won't regret buying this book.

This is a well written story on the building of the Panama Canal. Matthew Parker focuses on the French efforts in the 1880s to the United States taking over the project in 1904. Several key figures are discussed such as Ferdinand de Lesseps, John Stevens, Theodore Roosevelt, William Gorgas and others from various skilled backgrounds. The author is extremely effective in telling the human side of the story, which is the area I usually find most compelling. The sheer scale of this project is enough to merit praise for those who were involved in this engineering marvel, though it had negative aspects to its building as well.

From the earliest explorers, the narrowness of the Panamanian Isthmus presented great potential to those who could envision the linking of the two oceans. Over time, we see competing ideas of where the canal should be built, e.g. such as the early U.S. view of building it in Nicaragua. People like Ferdinand de Lesseps, who built the Suez Canal, wanted it to be a sea level canal, while it was later on conceded that only a lock canal would be possible. How would the building of the canal be funded? Where would the labor force come from? How would the natural environment be manipulated? These were some of the major issues faced.

The nature of the Panamanian Isthmus, and its political status are also delved into. The controversial U.S. involvement in the independence of Panama is discussed in some detail. The United States had at this time an imperialistic streak, especially when seen against the backdrop of the Spanish-American War. Panama was in essence a government propped up by the U.S. Government in its desire to have control over the canal zone.

The French effort in building the canal ended in bankruptcy. The toll the building of the canal took on its workers, such as the sad story of Jules Dingler and his family, can't be overlooked either. Yellow fever, malaria, and other diseases ravaged the work force. Parker is good at tracing the stories behind some of the workers and leaders involved in the canal project. What motivated them to travel so far, how they adapted to or struggled in their new surroundings, and the families that came over with them (usually later on) all offer powerful glimpses into the actual goings on in the Canal Zone.

The Americans took up the work the French had begun and finally completed it in 1914, just when world events were beginning to take on a whole new shape. The struggles in controlling the Chagres River, mudslides, and all the other powers of nature made the project difficult for the Americans as well As I mentioned earlier, the human element comes through most powerfully in this narrative, whether it be in the fields of construction and engineering, or fighting diseases, or just coping with living conditions on the Isthmus. The racist attitudes that resulted in better living conditions for the whites than the West Indians, the power of nationalistic feeling, and the likes also weave into this story.

The ending felt a bit rushed in my opinion. Parker briefly touched on the impact the canal had on countries like Panama and the U.S., but his primary focus was on the building of the canal. While he was certainly critical of those who oversaw the project, he also gave credit to the talents of those who were involved, from both the French and American sides. Overall, a very good read.